Fossil Science  
Recent News |  Archives |  Tags |  About |  Newsletter |  Submit News |  Links |  Subscribe to FossilScience.com RSS Feed Subscribe

Natural Selection and the Human Skull (3/19/2008)

Tags:
humans, neanderthals

 	 The approximate locations of the cranial measurements used in the analyses are superimposed as red lines on lateral (A), anterior (B), and inferior (C) views of a human cranium. Credit: National Academy of Sciences, PNAS
The approximate locations of the cranial measurements used in the analyses are superimposed as red lines on lateral (A), anterior (B), and inferior (C) views of a human cranium. Credit: National Academy of Sciences, PNAS
New research led by UC Davis anthropologist Tim Weaver adds to the evidence that chance, rather than natural selection, best explains why the skulls of modern humans and ancient Neanderthals evolved differently. The findings may alter how anthropologists think about human evolution.

Weaver's study appears in the March 17 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. It builds on findings from a study he and his colleagues published last year in the Journal of Human Evolution, in which the team compared cranial measurements of 2,524 modern human skulls and 20 Neanderthal specimens. The researchers concluded that random genetic change, or genetic drift, most likely account for the cranial differences.

In their new study, Weaver and his colleagues crunched their fossil data using sophisticated mathematical models -- and calculated that Neanderthals and modern humans split about 370,000 years ago. The estimate is very close to estimates derived by other researchers who have dated the split based on clues from ancient Neanderthal and modern-day human DNA sequences.

The close correlation of the two estimates -- one based on studying bones, one based on studying genes -- demonstrates that the fossil record and analyses of DNA sequences give a consistent picture of human evolution during this time period.

"A take-home message may be that we should reconsider the idea that all morphological (physical) changes are due to natural selection, and instead consider that some of them may be due to genetic drift," Weaver said. "This may have interesting implications for our understanding of human evolution."

Weaver conducted the research with Charles Roseman, an anthropologist at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and Chris Stringer, a paleontologist at the Natural History Museum in London.

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by UC Davis

Post Comments:

Search

Recent Articles
Eruptions wiped out ocean life 94 million years ago 7/20/2008

Reconstruction the brain morphology of Homo Liujiang cranium fossil by 3-D CT 7/19/2008

Archaeologists trace early irrigation farming in ancient Yemen 7/18/2008

Researcher Leads Worldwide Study on Marine Fossil Diversity 7/17/2008

Was it a bird or was it a plane? 7/16/2008

Researcher Leads Underwater Archeological Expedition in Gulf of Mexico in Search of First Americans 7/15/2008

New fossil tells twisted tale of how flatfishes ended up with two eyes on one side of head 7/11/2008

Big brains arose twice in higher primates 7/10/2008

Fossil feathers preserve evidence of color 7/9/2008

Newcomer in early eurafrican population? 7/5/2008

Species Have Come and Gone at Different Rates than Previously Believed 7/4/2008

Archaeologists find silos and administration center from early Egyptian city 7/3/2008

Unheard of life history for a vertebrate 7/2/2008

Dinosaur fact file 6/28/2008

Researchers Test Canine Tooth Strength for Clues to Behavior of Early Human Ancestors 6/27/2008

  Archives |  Submit News |  Advertise With Us |  Contact Us |  Links
All contents © 2000 - 2009 Web Doodle, LLC. All rights reserved.