Fossil Science
Recent News |  Archives |  Tags |  About |  Newsletter |  Submit News |  Links |  Subscribe to FossilScience.com RSS Feed Subscribe
New Articles
Earliest Animal Footprints Ever Found - Discovered In Nevada 10/7/2008

Egalitarian revolution in the Pleistocene? 10/6/2008

Ancient whalers leave their mark on the north 10/5/2008

Meat-eating dinosaur from Argentina had bird-like breathing system 10/4/2008

A new dinosaur species, Pachyrhinosaur lakustai, unveiled from Pipestone Creek, Alberta, Canada 10/3/2008

Canada's shores saved animals from devastating climate change 10/2/2008

Mass extinctions and the slow rise of dinosaurs 10/1/2008

Mother Of A Goose! Giant Ocean-going Geese With Bony-teeth Once Roamed Across SE England 9/27/2008

America's smallest dinosaur uncovered 9/25/2008

Primordial fish had rudimentary fingers 9/23/2008

What's in a dinosaur name? 9/18/2008

Roman York skeleton could be early TB victim 9/17/2008

Thick-boned fish reveals paleoclimate in Qaidam Basin 9/16/2008

Extinct species had large teeth on roof of mouth 9/15/2008

Fossilized Discovery Leads Paleontologist to Find Early Whales Used Back Legs for Swimming 9/14/2008

New Zealand colonised 1000 years later (6/4/2008)

Tags:
mammals, humans, rats, migration, new zealand

Rat-gnawed matai nut
Rat-gnawed matai nut
A University of Adelaide palaeontologist has helped to uncover compelling new evidence that New Zealand was discovered 1000 years later than commonly believed.

Trevor Worthy is part of an international team of four researchers who have used radiocarbon dating of Pacific rat bones and rat-gnawed native seeds to show that humans arrived on New Zealand about 1280-1300AD, not 200BC as previously thought.

The controversial finding has been published today in the prestigious journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in the United States.

Mr Worthy, from the School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, said the carbon dating results do not support previous claims published in Nature in 1996 that humans visited the country over 2000 years ago.

"There is no supporting ecological or archaeological evidence for the presence of Pacific rat or humans until 1280-1300AD and the reliability of the bone dating from that first study has been questioned," he said.

This is the first time that the actual sites involved in the original study have been re-excavated and analysed.

Team leader Dr Janet Wilmshurst from Landcare Research in New Zealand said the dating of the rat bones is consistent with other evidence from the oldest dated archaeological sites in the country.

"As the Pacific rat or kiore cannot swim very far, it can only have arrived in New Zealand with people on board their canoes, either as cargo or stowaways. Therefore, the earliest evidence of the Pacific rat in New Zealand must indicate the arrival of people," Dr Wilmshurst said.

The dating of the rat bones is also supported by the dating of more than 100 woody seeds, many of which have distinctive tell-tale rat bite marks, preserved in peat and swamp sites from the North and South Islands.

The finding suggests that colonisation of New Zealand did not involve a protracted delay between initial discovery and subsequent colonisation, an idea implicit in earlier theories.

"The first people arriving in New Zealand from tropical east Polynesia initiated an immediate and rapid transformation," Dr Wilmshurst said.

Mr Worthy, a world bird expert, joined the University of Adelaide from New Zealand in 2005. He has just completed his PhD on fossil waterfowl of Australia and New Zealand.

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by the University of Adelaide

Post Comments:

Search

  Archives |  Submit News |  Advertise With Us |  Contact Us |  Links
All contents © 2000 - 2009 Web Doodle, LLC. All rights reserved.